public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@hell.org.pl>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.0-mm2] PM timer still has problems
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:54:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040105225400.GA5495@hell.org.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073341969.15645.106.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>

Thus wrote john stultz:
> > > If the override boot option failed, its most likely your system doesn't
> > > have an ACPI PM time source.  Instead it seems your system is having
> > Well, I don't have the slightest idea on how to determine this, though I
> > read somewhere that all ACPI-compliant systems have those.
> More debug output is probably needed. 

I'll be happy to provide it :)

> > > trouble using the PIT as a time source (which seems not all that
> > > uncommon unfortunately). 
> > Perhaps, though bear in mind it behaves so only if clock=pmtmr has been
> > appended and works fine with clock=pit.
> Ah, I must have missed that point. Indeed that is very odd. When booting
> without the clock= what time source is used? Does booting w/
> "clock=crazy" also show the problem?

It depends -- generally either PIT (that's 2.4) or TSC, the latter switches
back to PIT once CPUFreq is used. I've never seen any problems with the
bogomips loop or /proc/cpuinfo, except when it could be directly attributed
to CPUFreq bugs.

I booted the following with clock=crazy:
1) 2.6.1-rc1-mm1 with Dmitry's patch: deadlock as before
2) 2.6.0-test11-almost vanilla (Nigel's swsusp patches): passed, results
   similar to -rc1-mm1 vanilla, i.e. cpuinfo shows 0 MHz and bogomips is
   miscalculated.

So it seems to be a more generic problem.
2.6.1-rc1 is on the way.

Best regards,

-- 
Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
sziwan@hell.org.pl

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-05 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-30 20:48 [2.6.0-mm2] PM timer still has problems Karol Kozimor
2003-12-31  4:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-04  0:44   ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05  6:17     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-01-05 12:18       ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-06  8:31       ` john stultz
2004-01-07  6:30         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-01-07 17:01           ` john stultz
2004-03-29 15:44       ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05 22:11 ` john stultz
2004-01-05 22:17   ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05 22:32     ` john stultz
2004-01-05 22:54       ` Karol Kozimor [this message]
2004-01-05 23:18       ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-05 23:30         ` john stultz
2004-01-06  4:32   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-01-17  1:54     ` Karol Kozimor
2004-01-24  0:55     ` Karol Kozimor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040105225400.GA5495@hell.org.pl \
    --to=sziwan@hell.org.pl \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox