From: Andi Kleen <ak@colin2.muc.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, David Hinds <dhinds@sonic.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI memory allocation bug with CONFIG_HIGHMEM
Date: 6 Jan 2004 05:05:46 +0100
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 05:05:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040106040546.GA77287@colin2.muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401051937510.2653@home.osdl.org>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:40:11PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > IMHO the only reliable way to get physical bus space for mappings
> > is to allocate some memory and map the mapping over that.
>
> You literally can't do that: the RAM addresses are decoded by the
> northbridge before they ever hit the PCI bus, so it's impossible to "map
> over" RAM in general.
Are you sure? I have a doc from AMD somewhere on the memory ordering
on K8 and it gives this order: (highest to lowest)
AGP aperture, TSEG, ASEG, IORR, Fixed MTRR, TOP_MEM
Note that TOP_MEM comes last, IORR comes earlier. It would require
setting an IORR though, which would be admittedly a bit nasty
(there are not that many of them). As long as it is only a single
area it should be possible though, we already have some code to change
IORRs in the AGP driver. That would be admittedly AMD specific,
but I suspect Intel has a similar mechanism.
I have successfully mapped the AGP aperture
over RAM and also seen it shadowing PCI mappings. I admit I haven't tried
it with PCI mappings.
But can you suggest a reliable way to find a memory hole in e820?
I haven't one figured out and AFAIK there isn't even any guarantee
by the BIOS that there is any. e.g. Opteron BIOS tend to use all
the precious space < 4GB up for existing mappings and I would expect
other i386 BIOS to behave the same.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-06 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1aJdi-7TH-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-06 3:32 ` PCI memory allocation bug with CONFIG_HIGHMEM Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 3:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 4:05 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-01-06 5:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 8:12 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 9:11 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-01-06 9:44 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 10:16 ` Mika Penttilä
2004-01-06 10:49 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 15:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 15:37 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-06 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 22:29 ` Adam Belay
2004-01-07 4:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 5:02 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07 5:55 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-07 6:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 6:08 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-07 6:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 6:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07 2:43 ` Adam Belay
2004-01-07 8:32 ` Helge Hafting
2004-01-06 22:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 0:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 4:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 5:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 15:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-07 17:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-08 19:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 9:31 ` Russell King
2004-01-07 15:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-07 20:29 ` Russell King
2004-01-06 22:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-05 20:07 David Hinds
2004-01-05 23:00 ` Russell King
2004-01-05 23:45 ` David Hinds
2004-01-06 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 0:44 ` David Hinds
2004-01-06 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-06 1:41 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040106040546.GA77287@colin2.muc.de \
--to=ak@colin2.muc.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=dhinds@sonic.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox