From: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mfedyk@matchmail.com,
Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>,
Reiserfs developers mail-list <Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com>,
grev@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:08:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040107120821.GG415627@linuxhacker.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FFBE6D3.7090701@namesys.com>
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:00:35PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >>can we get gcc to issue us a warning? there might be other stuff
> >>lurking around also....
> >If you add -W switch to CFLAGS, you'd get A LOT of more warnings.
> >Also just reading manpage on gcc around description of that flag will
> >give you a list of options to individually turn on certain check types.
> >Also gcc 3.3 have this sort of " unsigned < 0 | unsigned > 0" checks on by
> >default, I think.
> Sigh, this means that not one member of our team bothered to compile
> with -W and cleanup things that were found? Sad. This is what happens
Well, I was doing these sorts of stuff and cleaning all stuff that I thought
was important enough.
Both on kernel code and progs code.
Also reiser4progs include -W switch by default (and -Werror as well) I think.
At least that was the case back in September.
Bye,
Oleg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-05 23:20 Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested Jesper Juhl
2004-01-06 8:51 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-06 11:28 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-06 17:46 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-06 21:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-01-06 22:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-06 23:37 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-06 23:53 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-01-07 9:26 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-07 10:01 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-01-07 11:00 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-07 12:08 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2004-01-07 12:17 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-07 12:27 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-01-07 17:45 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-13 16:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-01-06 22:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-06 22:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-06 23:26 ` Hans Reiser
2004-01-07 0:46 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040107120821.GG415627@linuxhacker.ru \
--to=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com \
--cc=grev@namesys.com \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox