public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Felix von Leitner <felix-kernel@fefe.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.1 sendfile regression
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:21:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040109162149.1e88a643.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040110000128.GA301@codeblau.de>

Felix von Leitner <felix-kernel@fefe.de> wrote:
>
> I'm getting a huge sendfile regression in 2.6.1; when serving a large
> file on an IPv4 TCP socket via sendfile64, the transfer starts at about
> 4 MB (2.6.0: >7 MB) and the hard disk like stays on 100% (which normally
> only happens if the file is badly fragmented, fragmentation of this file
> is 0%).  Then, suddenly, the network performance drops dramatically,
> getting worse and worse.  strace shows that the process is hanging
> inside sendfile64 (which should not happen since the socket is
> non-blocking).  The process then stays inside sendfile for up to a
> minute or so and can't be interrupted or killed in that time.
> 

Probably it is the ill-advised readahead tweak.  Does the below patch fix
it up?

diff -puN mm/filemap.c~a mm/filemap.c
--- 25/mm/filemap.c~a	Fri Jan  9 16:20:32 2004
+++ 25-akpm/mm/filemap.c	Fri Jan  9 16:20:46 2004
@@ -596,12 +596,6 @@ void do_generic_mapping_read(struct addr
 	offset = *ppos & ~PAGE_CACHE_MASK;
 	last = (*ppos + desc->count) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
 
-	/*
-	 * Let the readahead logic know upfront about all
-	 * the pages we'll need to satisfy this request
-	 */
-	for (; index < last; index++)
-		page_cache_readahead(mapping, ra, filp, index);
 	index = *ppos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
 
 	for (;;) {

_


  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-10  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-10  0:01 2.6.1 sendfile regression Felix von Leitner
2004-01-10  0:21 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-01-10  0:52   ` Ram Pai
2004-01-10  1:42     ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-10  5:23 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-01-12  2:58   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-12 11:31     ` Lennert Buytenhek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040109162149.1e88a643.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=felix-kernel@fefe.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox