From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:08:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040109180839.GW1882@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0401091141200.12106@jju_lnx.backbone.dif.dk>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> I just wanted to get some feedback initially. The patch was a very minor
> bit of the email I send, and probably the least important bit.
> I wanted to get peoples reactions to the thought of adding stronger sanity
> checks. The patch was just a minor thing - the discussion about "do we
> want additional checks?" was the important bit.
There are some patches for the elf loader from one of the big names in LKML,
but I forgot who it was. Maybe a search through google will bring something
up...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-09 2:19 [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 2:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 3:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 3:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-09 3:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 20:20 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-09 20:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-10 0:27 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-01-10 2:27 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-10 9:52 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-01-10 13:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-10 22:38 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-01-10 22:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-10 14:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-22 19:24 ` [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanitychecking Adrian Bunk
2004-01-09 3:36 ` [PATCH][RFC] invalid ELF binaries can execute - better sanity checking Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 4:15 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-09 10:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-09 10:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-09 18:08 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-01-09 18:25 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040109180839.GW1882@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox