public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivanovich <ivanovich@menta.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:55:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401091955.55007.ivanovich@menta.net> (raw)

Jean Delvare wrote:

>> I thinks that thgere is  probably a bug in I2c-viapro module,
>> cuz when i load i2c-viapro after loading w82781d, my computer  just
>> put very slow..., i try loading as modules in the kernel or built in,
>> in both cases i have the same problem.
>>
>> I use 2.6.0 Vanilla Kernel sources.
>> Please i will really apreciate if some one responde to this
>> mail, put my adress in the CC field please cuz i not in the LKML.
>> If someone need another information about my computer, config..
>> or somehting more, just ask for it.
>>
>> Thanks.
> 
> Tested this on my own system with similar hardware (as far as i2c is
> concerned) under 2.6.1-rc2. I did not experience any slowdown.
> 
> Could you please provide the following information:
> 
> * Output of "lspci -n".
> 
> * Can you reproduce the problem with a 2.4.24 kernel and i2c+lm_sensors
>   2.8.2?
> 
> * Can you reproduce the problem with a 2.6.1-rc2 kernel?
> 
> * Can you reproduce the problem without ACPI support enabled into your
>   kernel?
> 
> * Does the slowdown affect only the hard-disk drive?
> 
> * Does the speed come back to normal if you remove i2c-viapro?
> 
> * Does the slowdown occur if you load i2c-viapro before w83781d?
> 
> Yeah, I know, this is much work, but we need a hint to start digging.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


>> ACPI: RSDT (v001 ASUS   CUV4X_E 
I have this very same board CUV4X_E and the same problem too (present in 2.6.0 
and before)
The workaround i found is to not initialize the chip "modprobe w83781d init=0"

And answering some of your questions, yes, the slowdown is global, not only 
disk and it doesn't gets better if you unload the modules.

It's fixed in 2.6.1? going to download+compile and see if it works. 
Thanks!


             reply	other threads:[~2004-01-09 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-09 18:55 Ivanovich [this message]
2004-01-10 11:41 ` Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug Jean Delvare
2004-01-10 14:40   ` Ivanovich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-07 19:55 Nicolas Nilles
2004-01-07 21:30 ` Jean Delvare
2004-01-08 15:11   ` Nicolas Nilles

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200401091955.55007.ivanovich@menta.net \
    --to=ivanovich@menta.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox