From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:14:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040110221402.GB17845@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073771855.3958.15.camel@nidelv.trondhjem.org>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:57:36PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> P? lau , 10/01/2004 klokka 15:04, skreiv Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> > Not change - keep (from 2.4). You see, the problem might be - somebody
> > updates the NFS-server from 2.4 to 2.6 and then suddenly some clients fail
> > to work with it. Seems a non-obvious fact, that after upgrading the server
> > clients' configuration might have to be changed. At the very least this
> > must be documented in Kconfig.
>
> Non-obvious????? You have to change modutils, you have to upgrade
> nfs-utils, glibc, gcc... and that's only the beginning of the list.
>
> 2.6.x is a new kernel it differs from 2.4.x, which again differs from
> 2.2.x, ... Get over it! There are workarounds for your problem, so use
> them.
I have to admit, I haven't been following NFS on TCP very much. Is the code
in the stock 2.4 and 2.6 kernels ready for production use? It seemed from
what I read it was still experemental (and even marked as such in the
config).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-10 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-06 0:46 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 13:36 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 22:30 ` bill davidsen
2004-01-08 12:48 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 17:49 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-07 18:13 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-07 18:19 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-07 19:06 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-09 10:08 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-09 18:00 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 0:38 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 1:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 11:10 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 14:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-10 20:04 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 21:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-10 22:14 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-01-10 22:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-10 22:42 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 22:51 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-11 13:18 ` Helge Hafting
2004-01-11 13:53 ` Russell King
2004-01-11 14:24 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-15 11:38 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-12 5:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-12 14:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-12 15:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-16 5:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-16 6:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-16 6:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 22:34 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 22:52 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-10 22:57 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-10 23:00 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-08 21:42 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-12 23:18 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-12 23:28 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-13 0:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-14 3:00 ` Daniel Roesen
2004-01-14 18:16 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-01-13 1:55 ` Slow NFS performance over wireless! Roman Gaufman
2004-01-13 2:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-13 20:25 ` Joshua M. Thompson
2004-01-13 20:45 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 1:12 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
[not found] ` <20040115013312.GO1594@srv-lnx2600.matchmail.com>
2004-01-15 2:04 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-01-15 2:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 19:00 ` Slowwwwwwwwwwww NFS read performance Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 19:53 ` Ram Pai
2004-01-15 20:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-15 20:54 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-18 6:04 ` Greg Fitzgerald
2004-01-18 17:55 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-16 0:52 ` Slow NFS performance [was: over wireless!] Miquel van Smoorenburg
[not found] <1cpDr-5az-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1csrv-Er-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-10 16:08 ` 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance Andi Kleen
2004-01-10 16:19 ` Trond Myklebust
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-12 14:40 James Pearson
2004-01-12 15:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-13 11:08 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040110221402.GB17845@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox