From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Yao <peter@exavio.com.cn>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: smp dead lock of io_request_lock/queue_lock patch
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:19:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040112091946.GA29779@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040112091903.GD24638@suse.de>
On Mon, Jan 12 2004, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 17:32, Peter Yao wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I found a smp dead lock in io_request_lock/queue_lock patch in redhat's
> > > 2.4.18-4 kernel.
> >
> > 1) Bugs in vendor kernels are best reported to the vendor, in this case
> > in http://bugzilla.redhat.com
> > 2) 2.4.18-4 is really old and has been superceeded by updates a few
> > dozen times
> > 3) 2.4.18-4 has both remote and local security issues and datacorruption
> > issues
>
> 4) The problem reported and patch looks real, though, maybe a little
> credit and thanks would be appropriate as well?
... and still exists in your 2.4.21 based kernel.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-12 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-12 16:32 smp dead lock of io_request_lock/queue_lock patch Peter Yao
2004-01-12 9:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-12 9:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-12 9:19 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-01-12 9:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-12 9:22 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-12 13:27 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-15 17:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-15 17:05 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-15 17:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-15 19:30 ` Doug Ledford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-19 21:36 Martin Peschke3
2004-03-08 21:25 ` Doug Ledford
[not found] <1d6yN-6HH-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1dasC-5Ww-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1ejkf-724-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1elvB-Jt-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-16 15:40 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-12 15:07 Martin Peschke3
2004-01-12 15:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-12 19:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-12 19:51 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-12 20:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-12 21:12 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-13 20:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-01-17 13:10 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-17 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-17 19:07 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-17 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-17 19:21 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-17 19:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-17 20:36 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-20 7:53 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-25 0:31 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-01-15 17:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-17 13:12 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-17 15:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-17 16:07 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-12 14:07 Martin Peschke3
2004-01-12 14:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-12 14:13 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-12 15:08 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-12 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2004-01-12 15:43 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-12 15:52 ` Doug Ledford
2004-01-12 16:04 ` James Bottomley
2004-01-12 16:05 ` Doug Ledford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040112091946.GA29779@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@exavio.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox