From: Haakon Riiser <haakon.riiser@fys.uio.no>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NTFS disk usage on Linux 2.6
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:02:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040115010210.GA570@s.chello.no> (raw)
Has anyone else noticed that the reported disk space usage on
NTFS is completely unreliable on Linux 2.6? Just issued the
command "du -sh" on my main Windows XP partition, and on 2.6.1,
the reported disk usage is bigger than the partition size.
Here's the output from "du -sh *" in Windows' root directory
under Linux 2.6.1:
0 AUTOEXEC.BAT
0 CONFIG.SYS
43M Documents and Settings
0 IO.SYS
0 MSDOS.SYS
48K NTDETECT.COM
366M Program Files
0 RECYCLER
20K System Volume Information
12G WINDOWS
0 boot.ini
232K ntldr
768M pagefile.sys
Same command on 2.4.24:
0 AUTOEXEC.BAT
0 CONFIG.SYS
41M Documents and Settings
0 IO.SYS
0 MSDOS.SYS
48K NTDETECT.COM
366M Program Files
2.0K RECYCLER
21K System Volume Information
1.4G WINDOWS
1.0K boot.ini
230K ntldr
770M pagefile.sys
(The contents of the filesystem was, of course, identical in both
cases -- I did not run Windows in between these tests.)
Compare the disk space used by the WINDOWS directory in the
two listings. On 2.4.24, it correctly reports 1.4G, while
2.6.1 reports 12G, which is 2G more than the total space on
the filesystem.
I also compared this to the listings produced by "ls -lR"
(summing the numbers on the "total ..." lines). The result
was the same as with du -sh.
--
Haakon
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-15 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-15 1:02 Haakon Riiser [this message]
2004-01-15 14:51 ` NTFS disk usage on Linux 2.6 Craig Taylor
2004-01-15 16:03 ` Disconnect
2004-01-15 19:05 ` David Sanders
2004-01-15 22:34 ` Wes Janzen
2004-01-16 0:43 ` Adam Sampson
2004-01-18 0:55 ` Haakon Riiser
2004-01-19 14:24 ` Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040115010210.GA570@s.chello.no \
--to=haakon.riiser@fys.uio.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox