From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266026AbUAQKBx (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:01:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266027AbUAQKBx (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:01:53 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:27818 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266026AbUAQKBw (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:01:52 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 02:01:27 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: "Amit S. Kale" Cc: Linux Kernel , Pavel Machek , Tom Rini , George Anzinger , Steve Gonczi , Matt Mackall Subject: Re: kgdb 2.0.4 with restructuring and fixes Message-ID: <20040117100127.GI1332@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , "Amit S. Kale" , Linux Kernel , Pavel Machek , Tom Rini , George Anzinger , Steve Gonczi , Matt Mackall References: <200401171451.38701.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401171451.38701.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:51:38PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote: > kgdb 2.0.4 is available at http://kgdb.sourceforge.net ChangeLog below. > Thanks. > Amit Kale > EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com) > KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net) > 2004-01-17 Tom Rini > * Some restructuring to allow architectures to provide different > serial infos to the kgdb serial interface. > 2004-01-17 Pavel Machek > * Cleanups > * changed calling convention from 0 on success, 1 on failure to 0 on > success, -ERRNO on fail to be more consistent with rest of kernel > * Made kgdb waiting for connection message KERN_CRIT > * export kern_schedule only if CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD is defined This sound great. Any chance you could splatter this out at a patch series to lkml for those of us so entrenched in pre-1994 conventions (such as myself) as to dislike chasing URL's from mailing list posts? -- wli