public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>,
	vatsa@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, rml@tech9.net
Subject: Re: CPU Hotplug: Hotplug Script And SIGPWR
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:29:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040120082943.GA15733@hockin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <400CE354.8060300@cyberone.com.au>

On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:14:12PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >Under what conditions?  Not arbitrary entropy, surely.  If a hotplug script
> >is present and does not blow up, it should be safe to assume it will be run
> >upon an event being delivered.  If not, we have a WAY bigger problem :)
> >
> 
> That assumption is not safe. The main problems are of course process limits
> and memory allocation failure.

If root has a process limit that make hotplug scripts fail to run, then
we're hosed in a lot of ways.  And if we fail to allocate memory, there
really ought to be some retry or something.  It seems to me that a failure
to run a hotplug script is a BAD THING.

> >Sending it a SIGPWR means you have to run it on a different CPU that it was
> >affined to, which is already a violation.
> 
> At least the task has the option to handle the problem.

But it is a violation of the affinity.  As the kernel we CAN NOT know what
the affinity really means.  Maybe there is some way for a task to indicate
it would like to receive SIGPWR in that case.  Or some other signal.  Can we
invent new signals?

That way a task that KNOWS about the CPU disappearing underneath it can be
wise, while everything else will not just get killed.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-20  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040116174446.A2820@in.ibm.com>
2004-01-20  5:44 ` CPU Hotplug: Hotplug Script And SIGPWR Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  6:33   ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  6:43     ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  6:52       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  7:11         ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  7:30           ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  7:45             ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  7:54               ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  8:14                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  8:29                   ` Tim Hockin [this message]
2004-01-20  8:37                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  8:43                       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21  4:06                         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-01-21  4:14                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-21  5:09                             ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-01-21  7:08                               ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21 15:07                                 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-01-22  5:29                                 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-21  7:09                             ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21  7:31                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-21  7:42                                 ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21  8:11                             ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-21  5:07                           ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  8:41                   ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-01-20  8:49                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-20  9:12                       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-21  0:00                 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20 23:51         ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  7:45     ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-20  8:37       ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-20  9:29         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-01-21  0:12         ` Rusty Russell
     [not found] <fa.f37o48p.1io5q5@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.frjqvfo.170g8hq@ifi.uio.no>
2004-01-20 17:49   ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-01-21  4:33     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040120082943.GA15733@hockin.org \
    --to=thockin@hockin.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox