From: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
Powerpc Linux <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KGDB bugreports <kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: PPC KGDB changes and some help?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:23:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401212223.13347.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040121153019.GR13454@stop.crashing.org>
Hi,
Here it is: ppc kgdb from timesys kernel is available at
http://kgdb.sourceforge.net/kgdb-2/linux-2.6.1-kgdb-2.1.0.tar.bz2
This is my attempt at extracting kgdb from TimeSys kernel. It works well in
TimeSys kernel, so blame me if above patch doesn't work.
ChangeLog:
2004-01-21 TimeSys Corporation
* kgdb on powerpc.
2004-01-21 Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
* Changes for coding conventions
2004-01-21 Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
* Added a prototype for kgdb8250_add_port.
On Wednesday 21 Jan 2004 9:00 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 07:46:17PM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Yes. Software breakpoints have been tested in the TimeSys ppc kernel
> > source. They work quite well!! I'll be releasing that code soon.
>
> Any chance you can give me what they gave you? I can try and merge
> and test things.
>
> > Here are a couple of questions from a quick look at this code. I may have
> > more when I do a merge this code with what I have.
> >
> > > - bl schedule
> > > + bl user_schedule
> >
> > I still have #ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD here. Threads listing is a
> > necessary feature, agreed. Do you have any ideas on reducing the overhead
> > of the code added by having to push all registers when doing a switch_to?
> >
> > if (kgdb enabled) do a full push of registers else go to usual switch_to
> >
> > Does this sound good?
>
> From what I recall of starting on this around kgdb 2.0.2, I couldn't
> link the kernel w/o this change (KGDB=n).
>
> > > + */
> > > +#if 0
> > > + extern atomic_t kgdb_setting_breakpoint;
> > > + if (atomic_read(&kgdb_setting_breakpoint))
> > > + regs->nip += 4;
> > > +#else
> > > + if (linux_regs->nip == 0x7d821008 )
> > > + /* Skip over breakpoint trap insn */
> > > + linux_regs->nip += 4;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Why is kgdb_setting_breakpoint a bad idea?
> > My guess - problems on an smp board.
>
> I don't know how well the current kgdb stub is tested on SMP, but it
> doesn't need any extra locking here.
>
> > Hardcoded nip is worse.
> > Any ideas for a better code?
>
> I've got a feeling that the nip is always the trap instruction, so we
> could always do what the TimeSys code (and before that, the current
> stub) does of skipping over it. I used the hard-coded value there since
> I hadn't gotten around to re-arranging the code so I could do *(uint
> *)kgdb_ops->gdb_bpt_instr or so.
>
> > In following code, gdb packets and their responses appear correct. kgdb
> > is supposed handle software breakpoints.
> >
> > The breakpoint 0xc0000000 placed by gdb is _evil_ It may clobber data.
> > The gdb at kgdb.sourceforge.net places it correctly at module_event.
>
> I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. The gdb binary I'm using is
> a good one (It's happy w/ the current kgdb stub, working in tandem w/ a
> BDI2000, etc). If the breakpoints being set aren't right, I suspect
> that it's related to the other problems I'm seeing.
>
> > Where is the other breakpoint placed? While you would have certainly done
> > that, please confirm that kgdb actually inserts a breakpoint where you
> > have asked it to: a simple printk at the address where the breakpoint is
> > placed should be sufficient. printing from gdb will not work as gdb
> > removes all breakpoints before giving control to a user.
>
> The thing is the kernel gets into an infinite loop of stopping, as far
> as gdb can tell, at the initial breakpoint.
--
Amit Kale
EmSysSoft (http://www.emsyssoft.com)
KGDB: Linux Kernel Source Level Debugger (http://kgdb.sourceforge.net)
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-21 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040120172708.GN13454@stop.crashing.org>
[not found] ` <200401211946.17969.amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
[not found] ` <20040121153019.GR13454@stop.crashing.org>
2004-01-21 16:53 ` Amit S. Kale [this message]
2004-01-21 18:42 ` PPC KGDB changes and some help? Tom Rini
2004-01-21 19:21 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-21 19:22 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-22 17:44 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-22 18:05 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-23 22:46 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-23 23:38 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-26 20:46 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-26 21:27 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-26 21:42 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-26 22:35 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-26 21:45 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-26 22:06 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-27 9:05 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-01-24 0:48 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-24 3:47 ` [PATCH] Kgdb dwarf2 for asm George Anzinger
2004-01-27 18:22 ` PPC KGDB changes and some help? Tom Rini
2004-01-21 22:03 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-21 23:12 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-22 15:07 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-22 15:25 ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-01-22 15:45 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-22 16:06 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-01-22 16:45 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-22 22:46 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-22 22:52 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-22 23:09 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-22 22:35 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-23 17:08 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-22 21:54 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-26 21:32 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-27 8:59 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-01-21 23:05 ` George Anzinger
2004-01-22 15:03 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401212223.13347.amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--to=amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox