From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Zan Lynx <zlynx@acm.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:08:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040121230851.A27913@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040121211550.GK9327@redhat.com>; from davej@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:15:50PM +0000
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:15:50PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
> Closed lists are just *rude*. The only intention is to stop spam,
> but personally, I find hoop-jumping like this *more* of an inconvenience
> than spam, (and I get a *lot* of spam, several megs a day on a quiet day)
Umm, I don't think that's entirely correct. There's a problem in the
UK and EU with 100% open mailing lists - it's called data protection,
where the owner of their personal data has certain rights. I believe
that it is questionable whether such open lists can be run in the EU,
or even by EU individuals.
There appears to be two ways around this problem:
1. Only allow list members to be able to look at the list archives.
This precludes the ability of search engines (eg google) to be able
to index such archives. It also means that archive sites outside
the EU must not be permitted to subscribe to such a list. (List
owner control over this is virtually impossible since archive sites
don't generally ask permission before hand.)
2. Allow member-only posting and make membership of the list conditional
on an agreement which allows all information contained within the
message to be made publically available, and that such information
will be internationally distributed. This means that people who
have not agreed to the terms must be prevented from posting to the
list.
(1) is fine for things like LUG lists where the membership is fairly
small and the subject matter is not of international or universal
interest. However, it is unacceptable for highly technical lists
and/or those of international interest.
Note that I'm not saying that closed lists are a good thing either -
I don't like closed lists either, both from the user and more especially
the admin point of view, but I've have come to the conclusion that it
is a necessary evil which we have to bear in our increasingly litigious
world.
[Please note: I am aware of an instance where someone has indeed used
the UK's Data Protection Act in connection with a mailing list to get
the lists archives modified or the list shut down.]
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-21 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ecartis-01212004203954.14209.1@mail.convergence2.de>
2004-01-21 19:43 ` List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts Dave Jones
2004-01-21 19:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-01-21 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-21 19:56 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 20:12 ` John Bradford
2004-01-21 21:44 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-22 5:11 ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-21 20:38 ` Zan Lynx
2004-01-21 20:57 ` Charles Cazabon
2004-01-21 21:57 ` Diego Calleja
2004-01-21 21:15 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 21:29 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-01-21 21:30 ` [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: " Mike Fedyk
2004-01-21 22:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-01-21 23:01 ` Wakko Warner
2004-01-22 6:51 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-01-22 14:31 ` Wakko Warner
2004-01-21 23:40 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22 0:26 ` Zan Lynx
2004-01-22 5:14 ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-22 13:24 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-22 16:56 ` David Ford
2004-01-22 17:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-22 17:10 ` David Ford
2004-01-22 17:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-22 18:18 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22 17:11 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2004-01-22 17:30 ` viro
2004-01-22 17:34 ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2004-01-22 17:41 ` David Ford
2004-01-22 18:20 ` Brian Beattie
2004-01-23 7:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-01-23 9:24 ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-22 18:35 ` David Lang
2004-01-22 18:49 ` David Ford
2004-01-22 22:18 ` jw schultz
2004-01-22 22:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-22 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-23 6:49 ` David S. Miller
2004-01-23 15:38 ` Chris Ricker
2004-01-23 9:25 ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-23 19:38 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-22 22:43 ` Scott Laird
2004-01-24 20:14 ` Kevin O'Connor
2004-01-24 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-24 23:25 ` Kevin O'Connor
[not found] ` <1hDmg-4AP-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-24 23:59 ` Russ Allbery
2004-01-22 22:15 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2004-01-23 8:43 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-01-26 22:58 ` Max Valdez
2004-01-23 9:17 ` Paul Jakma
2004-01-22 5:13 ` Rik van Riel
2004-01-21 23:08 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-01-22 13:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-21 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-21 23:01 ` Marcus Metzler
2004-01-22 14:14 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-01-22 15:14 ` Marcus Metzler
2004-01-22 15:31 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-01-21 23:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-01-22 15:15 ` Michael Hunold
2004-01-22 15:18 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-21 20:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040121230851.A27913@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zlynx@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox