From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266144AbUAVBTa (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:19:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266147AbUAVBTa (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:19:30 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:29616 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266144AbUAVBT3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:19:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:56:55 -0800 From: Greg KH To: sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.1 Message-ID: <20040121235655.GF1958@kroah.com> References: <10745567662012@kroah.com> <10745567661358@kroah.com> <20040121225012.1addb5c7.khali@linux-fr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040121225012.1addb5c7.khali@linux-fr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:50:12PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Also note that I slightly altered the condition to display the PCILynx > > comment. I think it's more logical that way. Without it, the user > > could get the message he/she needs I2C, go to enable it, come back and > > still not see the option. > > For the records, please let it be noted that this change is *not* included > in the patch submitted by Greg. > > That said, I still think it was a good idea. Not that it matters much to > me since I don't use that driver, but anyway... Who should I contact to > get it included? The ieee1394 maintainer?