From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264451AbUAVPhd (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:37:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264484AbUAVPhc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:37:32 -0500 Received: from mail018.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.72]:11700 "EHLO mail018.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264451AbUAVPhc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:37:32 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Timothy Miller , Nick Piggin Subject: Re: Deadline for video capture Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 02:37:22 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: linux kernel mailing list References: <200401221608.05924.kernel@kolivas.org> <400F5CE5.6000602@cyberone.com.au> <400FDDF8.4080600@techsource.com> In-Reply-To: <400FDDF8.4080600@techsource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401230237.23138.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 01:28, Timothy Miller wrote: > Also, what kind of other system load was going on when the capture was > happening? A kernel compile? Basically idle. With the deadline scheduler I was able to continue using the machine without dropping frames. Con