From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
To: "Måns Rullgård" <mru@kth.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lindent fixed to match reality
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:42:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040129204250.GL16675@khan.acc.umu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1xr7xi1ojs.fsf@kth.se>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:35:03PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> writes:
>
> >> b) (no -bs) "sizeof(foo)" rather than "sizeof (foo)"
> >
> > I can't really see the logic in this, though I know a lot of people do
> > it. I try to stay consistent, thus I do:
> >
> > if ()
> > for ()
> > case ()
> > while ()
> > sizeof ()
> > typeof ()
> >
> > since they're all parts of the language, rather than
> > functions/macros or invocations of such.
>
> What I fail to see here is why that should make a difference regarding
> whitespace before the parens.
All I'm trying to say, is that we should be consistent; most code
has:
if (), for (), case (), while ()
(and possibly sizeof foo, typeof foo)
but
sizeof(foo), typeof(foo)
which is what I dislike (consistancy is good.)
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander (\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-29 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-29 19:37 Lindent fixed to match reality Matt Mackall
2004-01-29 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-29 20:00 ` Matt Mackall
2004-01-29 20:15 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-29 20:35 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-29 20:42 ` David Weinehall [this message]
2004-01-29 20:52 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-29 21:46 ` Matt Mackall
2004-01-29 22:37 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-01-29 22:54 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-29 23:17 ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-29 23:43 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-30 14:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-01-30 17:49 ` David Weinehall
2004-01-30 21:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-29 20:17 ` Roland Dreier
2004-01-29 20:37 ` Erik Hensema
2004-01-29 21:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2004-01-30 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-30 10:38 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040129204250.GL16675@khan.acc.umu.se \
--to=tao@acc.umu.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mru@kth.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox