public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: oops with 2.6.1-rc1 and rc-3
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 04:54:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040201025446.GD32642@luna.mooo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <401C5AEC.8060602@gmx.de>

On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 02:48:28AM +0100, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> This happened once with rc-1 vanilla and once with rc-3 (haven't used 
> rc2 long enough.) Never happened with a earlier kernel. The message 
> repeats eternally itself making the system next to unusuable.
> 
> Any idea how to fix it?
> 
> I am using siimage ide driver.
> 
> Prakash
> 
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon handlers:
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c02a6b50>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x190)
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c03248c0>] (snd_intel8x0_interrupt+0x0/0x210)
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon Disabling IRQ #11
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon irq 11: nobody cared!

This irq message has been reported by several people (including me), I
don't think there is a solution yet. AFAIK its not swsusp related.

> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon Call Trace:
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c010b0aa>] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0x90
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c010b19c>] note_interrupt+0x6c/0xb0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c010b451>] do_IRQ+0x121/0x130
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0109854>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0124080>] do_softirq+0x40/0xa0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c010b42d>] do_IRQ+0xfd/0x130
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0109854>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0281056>] generic_unplug_device+0x26/0x80
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c028121a>] blk_run_queues+0x7a/0xb0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c016605f>] __wait_on_buffer+0xbf/0xd0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c011e1c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c011e1c0>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c020dbb8>] submit_logged_buffer+0x38/0x60
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c020e1a3>] kupdate_one_transaction+0x1b3/0x210
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c020e275>] reiserfs_journal_kupdate+0x75/0xb0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0210ed4>] flush_old_commits+0x144/0x1d0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0122583>] do_exit+0x293/0x500
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c01fe942>] reiserfs_write_super+0x82/0x90
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c016b94c>] sync_supers+0xac/0xc0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c014b526>] wb_kupdate+0x36/0x120
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c02602d3>] tty_write+0x1d3/0x3f0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c026008e>] tty_read+0x18e/0x200
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c011c86d>] schedule+0x31d/0x590
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c01214c0>] reparent_to_init+0xf0/0x180
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c014bb4b>] __pdflush+0xcb/0x1b0
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c014bc30>] pdflush+0x0/0x20
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c014bc3f>] pdflush+0xf/0x20
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c014b4f0>] wb_kupdate+0x0/0x120
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0107284>] kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0xc
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon [<c0107289>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
> Feb  1 02:34:48 tachyon

I didn't check it in the kernel but at first sight it looks like
regular disks updates. I don't know what it goes into a loop. Are you
sure that you don't have something that keeps updating the disk?

> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-01  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-30  4:24 Software Suspend 2.0 Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-30 10:04 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-30 10:22   ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-30 10:25   ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 18:09     ` Micha Feigin
2004-02-05  0:47     ` Software Suspend 2.0 [for 2.6.2 resend] Hugang
2004-01-31  6:22 ` [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0 Luke-Jr
2004-01-31  6:37   ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  6:48     ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31  6:56       ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  7:16         ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31  7:28           ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  7:38             ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31  7:48               ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  8:32               ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  9:03                 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31  9:08                   ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  9:19                     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31  9:51                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 10:43                         ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31 10:48                           ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31 13:25                           ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-31 23:11                             ` Joseph Pingenot
2004-01-31 22:15                               ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-01  0:26                               ` Micha Feigin
2004-02-01  1:48                                 ` oops with 2.6.1-rc1 and rc-3 Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-01  2:54                                   ` Micha Feigin [this message]
2004-02-01 10:36                                     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-01 11:37                                       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-01-31  9:35         ` [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0  Éric Brunet
2004-01-31  9:38           ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  7:22     ` Luke-Jr
2004-01-31  7:31       ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31  8:09         ` Luke-Jr
2004-01-31  8:11           ` Luke-Jr
2004-01-31  8:18           ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-01-31 15:23 ` Sebastian Kugler
2004-02-01  7:08 ` Hugang
2004-02-02 17:01   ` swsusp2 on ppc [Re: Software Suspend 2.0] Marco Giordani
2004-02-03  1:37     ` Hugang
2004-02-03 12:07       ` Marco Giordani
     [not found] <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE0020AEB18@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-02-01 19:49 ` oops with 2.6.1-rc1 and rc-3 Len Brown
2004-02-02  8:45   ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-02 18:59     ` Len Brown
2004-02-02 20:51       ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-02 20:54         ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040201025446.GD32642@luna.mooo.com \
    --to=michf@post.tau.ac.il \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox