From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265420AbUBAUaV (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:30:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265422AbUBAUaV (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:30:21 -0500 Received: from cats-mx2.ucsc.edu ([128.114.129.35]:4088 "EHLO ucsc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265420AbUBAUaS (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:30:18 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 12:31:02 -0800 From: Jim McCloskey To: kernel@pirispons.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: net-pf-10, 2.6.1 Message-ID: <20040201203102.GA331@ohlone> References: <20040201094616.GA28327@pirispons.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040201094616.GA28327@pirispons.net> X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux/2.6.1 (i686) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-UCSC-CATS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UCSC-CATS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Kiko Piris (kernel@pirispons.net) wrote: |> AFAIK, this was fixed in 3.0-pre6 version of module-init-tools: |> |> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107449592106965&w=2 |> |> Why don't you just upgrade it and forget those ugly workarounds? |> |> I don't know which distro you are running, 3.0-pre9-1 got into debian |> sid today or yesterday. Thank you indeed for this. I upgraded to the version in Debian unstable (3.0-pre9-1, as you say) and all works as expected. I'm grateful to all who helped and especially for your patience. Jim