From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265452AbUBAVCU (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:02:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265468AbUBAVCU (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:02:20 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:10745 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265452AbUBAVCS (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:02:18 -0500 From: Christian Borntraeger To: Markus =?iso-8859-1?q?H=E4stbacka?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Uptime counter Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 22:02:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402012202.07204.kernel@borntraeger.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:5a8b66f42810086ecd21595c2d6103b9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Markus Hästbacka wrote: > Hi list, > I wonder does any kernel branch have a uptime counter that doesn't stop > counting at 497 days? Or is a patch needed for the job to > 2.{0,2,4,6} kernel? In 2.6 there is no 497 days limit, as jiffies are now 64 bit. By the way: Having a machine with more than 497 days of uptime normally shows a serios lack of security awareness.. cheers Christian