From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266574AbUBDVan (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:30:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266576AbUBDVah (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:30:37 -0500 Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.6]:5530 "EHLO hirsch.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266574AbUBDVaU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:30:20 -0500 X-Envelope-From: kraxel@bytesex.org Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:28:41 +0100 From: Gerd Knorr To: Jim Faulkner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: major network performance difference between 2.4 and 2.6.2-rc2 Message-ID: <20040204212841.GA9205@bytesex.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > While doing a large network transfer, and not at any other time, I get > tons of messages like this from the kernel: > > Feb 4 15:14:05 delta-9 i2c IR (Hauppauge): unknown key: key=0x3f raw=0x3fff down=0 > Feb 4 15:14:06 delta-9 i2c IR (Hauppauge): unknown key: key=0x3f raw=0x3fff down=1 > > I do have a hauppauge remote which works great under the 2.6 kernels > (thanks Gerd), but I am not pressing any keys while this is happening. Hmm, what happens if you rmmod the ir-kbd-i2c module? Any difference? > 3 root 35 19 0 0 0 S 45.9 0.0 0:46.98 ksoftirqd/0 > 6 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 43.3 0.0 1:56.63 events/0 One of the two could be ir-kbd-i2c, it polls the i2c IR chip using tasklets. Not sure which of the kernel threads runs the tasklets ... Gerd -- "... und auch das ganze Wochenende oll" -- Wetterbericht auf RadioEins