From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:31:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040205213158.GI11683@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040205212417.GI10547@stud.uni-erlangen.de>
On Thu, Feb 05 2004, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Okay, we may be dealing with the buggy hardware at this point. Would
> > it make sense to tell the drive to flush it caches? If there's no
> > other possibility, we might want cdrecord to reset drive at the end of
> > blank and/or to make it eject...
>
> It's not the drive, it's the kernel. We have to tell the kernel to
> *flush* *it's* buffers when doing an umount. See my other posting.
Partly, I still think the drive should report media changed after
knowingly doing a TOC blank (or change). But see my other post, should
work.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-05 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-05 21:24 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 21:31 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-05 20:33 Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 20:54 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:16 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:41 ` John Bradford
2004-02-13 23:19 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-03 13:18 Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 13:31 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 13:45 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 15:00 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 15:24 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 15:45 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 16:02 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 16:17 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 16:35 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 17:46 ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 18:02 ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 18:53 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 19:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 20:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 20:59 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 22:40 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-03 23:05 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-02-04 7:37 ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 23:31 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-02-06 7:58 ` John Bradford
2004-02-08 10:15 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-02-08 10:32 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-08 11:06 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 22:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 19:31 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 19:09 ` Derek Foreman
2004-02-03 19:51 ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 19:56 ` Fox!MURDER
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402031358450.770@uberdeity>
2004-02-03 21:07 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 15:28 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 18:23 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 20:04 ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:36 ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 20:41 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:12 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040205213158.GI11683@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox