public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com>
Cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, akpm@osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjbligh@us.ibm.com,
	dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:30:10 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040206103010.GI19011@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402060924.i169OWx30517@owlet.beaverton.ibm.com>


Hi,

> This patch allows for this_load to set max_load, which if I understand
> the logic properly is correct.  It then adds a check to imbalance to make
> sure a negative number hasn't been coerced into a large positive number.
> With this patch applied, the algorithm is *much* more conservative ...
> maybe *too* conservative but that's for another round of testing ...

Good stuff, I just gave the patch a spin and things seem a little
calmer. However Im still seeing a lot of balancing going on within a
node.

Setup:

2 threads per cpu.
2 nodes of 16 threads each.

I ran a single "yes > /dev/null"

And it looks like that process is bouncing around the entire node.
Below is a 2 second average.

Anton

cpu    user  system    idle             cpu    user  system    idle

node 0:
cpu0      2       0      99             cpu1      9       0      91
cpu2      1       0      99             cpu3      8       0      92
cpu4      3       0      97             cpu5     10       0      90
cpu6      2       0      98             cpu7     10       0      90
cpu8      2       0      98             cpu9      9       0      90
cpu10     3       0      96             cpu11     9       0      90
cpu12     2       0      98             cpu13    10       0      90
cpu14     2       1      97             cpu15    10       1      89

node 1:
cpu16     0       0     100             cpu17     0       0     100
cpu18     0       0     101             cpu19     0       0     100
cpu20     0       0     100             cpu21     0       0     101
cpu22     0       0     101             cpu23     0       0     100
cpu24     0       0     100             cpu25     0       0     100
cpu26     0       0     100             cpu27     0       0     100
cpu28     0       0     101             cpu29     0       0     100
cpu30     0       0     100             cpu31     0       0     100

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-06 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-06  9:24 [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1 Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06  9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 18:13   ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 21:57     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:30       ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 22:40         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:49           ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 23:08             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 10:30 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2004-02-06 18:15   ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 18:39     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 22:02       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:34         ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 22:48           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:42         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 22:53           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 23:11           ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 23:20             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 23:33               ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 23:41                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 23:47                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-07  0:11                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-07  0:25                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-07  0:31                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-07  9:50                           ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  0:40                             ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-08  1:12                               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  1:21                                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-08  1:41                                   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  3:20                                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-08  3:57                                       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  4:05                                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-08 12:14                                           ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  1:22                                 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-09 16:37                       ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-09 16:43                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 18:33   ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040206103010.GI19011@krispykreme \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjbligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox