From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265643AbUBFVFo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:05:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265621AbUBFVFo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:05:44 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:49389 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265643AbUBFVFn (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:05:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:04:26 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Bill Davidsen Cc: gene.heskett@verizon.net, Azog , Adrian Bunk , Tom Rini , Andre Noll , Linux-Kernel List Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove USB_SCANNER Message-ID: <20040206210426.GA1803@kroah.com> References: <20040126215036.GA6906@kroah.com> <20040205011423.GA6092@kroah.com> <1076001658.3225.101.camel@moria.arnor.net> <200402052015.22926.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <4024001D.80308@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4024001D.80308@tmr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:59:09PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > I think the problem is not that it doesn't work with kernel, but it > doesn't work with the application. And while some people may be able to > ignore having a system which will work with both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, > for many systems it may not be practical to change config to something > which will not work in 2.4 in hopes it might work in 2.6. The libusb solution for scanner devices works just fine with 2.4 also. thanks, greg k-h