public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 12:41:41 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040208014141.GX19011@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40258F21.30209@cyberone.com.au>


> Does active balancing still work? Ie. get two processes running on the
> same physical CPU and see if one is migrated away.

Both Ricks patch and your patch still have the active rebalance issue.

Martins patch doesnt, but that seems to be because it does absolutely no
rebalancing (all my runnable tasks are on one physical cpu) :)

Anton

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-08  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-06  9:24 [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1 Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06  9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 18:13   ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 21:57     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:30       ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 22:40         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:49           ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 23:08             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 10:30 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-06 18:15   ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 18:39     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 22:02       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:34         ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 22:48           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 22:42         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 22:53           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 23:11           ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-06 23:20             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 23:33               ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 23:41                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 23:47                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-07  0:11                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-07  0:25                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-07  0:31                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-07  9:50                           ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  0:40                             ` Rick Lindsley
2004-02-08  1:12                               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  1:21                                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-08  1:41                                   ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2004-02-08  3:20                                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-08  3:57                                       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  4:05                                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-08 12:14                                           ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-08  1:22                                 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-09 16:37                       ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-09 16:43                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 18:33   ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040208014141.GX19011@krispykreme \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox