From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264246AbUBIAif (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 19:38:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264507AbUBIAif (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 19:38:35 -0500 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.238]:59654 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264246AbUBIAie (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2004 19:38:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 21:38:28 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: Michael Frank Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] defer panic for too many items in boot parameter line Message-ID: <20040208213828.I1325@almesberger.net> References: <200402090623.05965.mhf@linuxmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402090623.05965.mhf@linuxmail.org>; from mhf@linuxmail.org on Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:23:04AM +0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Frank wrote: > Ah, nice, I like to defer a panic on zone init failure. > > Perhaps we could combine the panic side and use panic_later. Sure, why not ? In the long run, it would make sense to turn such not-really-fatal panics into something less drastic (I'm actually a bit surprised that these panics were added in the course of 2.5), but I guess that can wait. - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina werner@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/