From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Does anyone still care about BSD ptys?
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:06:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040209180651.GA15842@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c07i5r$ctq$1@news.cistron.nl>
On Mon, Feb 09, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <c07c67$vrs$1@terminus.zytor.com>,
> H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >Does anyone still care about old-style BSD ptys, i.e. /dev/pty*? I'm
> >thinking of restructuring the pty system slightly to make it more
> >dynamic and to make use of the new larger dev_t, and I'd like to get
> >rid of the BSD ptys as part of the same patch.
>
> bootlogd(8) which is used by Debian and Suse is started as the
> first thing at boottime. It needs a pty, and tries to use /dev/pts
> if it's there but falls back to BSD style pty's if /dev/pts isn't
> mounted - which will be the case 99% of the time.
mounting proc and dev/pts is the first thing our boot script does, since
a very long time. So it will not break anything.
--
USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!
sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-09 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-09 7:17 Does anyone still care about BSD ptys? H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-09 7:21 ` David Weinehall
2004-02-09 7:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-09 8:12 ` Ricky Beam
2004-02-09 8:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-09 8:59 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-09 10:09 ` viro
2004-02-09 10:47 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-10 1:33 ` bill davidsen
2004-02-10 2:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-09 18:06 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2004-02-09 9:29 ` Nick Craig-Wood
2004-02-09 12:47 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-09 13:40 ` Nick Craig-Wood
2004-02-09 14:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-09 17:51 ` Dominik Kubla
2004-02-09 18:27 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-09 20:59 ` Athanasius
2004-02-10 11:16 ` Dominik Kubla
2004-02-10 17:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-10 0:47 ` Karl Tatgenhorst
2004-02-10 0:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-10 1:35 ` Karl Tatgenhorst
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-09 13:49 Albert Cahalan
2004-02-09 17:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-09 17:18 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-09 20:32 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-10 11:40 ` Dominik Kubla
[not found] <c07c67$vrs$1@terminus.zytor.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <c07i5r$ctq$1@news.cistron.nl.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040209100940.GF21151@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040209104729.GA19401@traveler.cistron.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-09 14:45 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-09 17:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-09 16:57 Joerg Pommnitz
2004-02-10 17:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] <1ne1M-1Oc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-10 19:47 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-10 19:51 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-10 21:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-02-10 22:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-11 5:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040209180651.GA15842@suse.de \
--to=olh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).