public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Selective attach for ide-scsi
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:02:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040210000205.GG28026@serve.riede.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16423.17315.777835.128816@alkaid.it.uu.se> (from mikpe@csd.uu.se on Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:24:03 -0500)

On 2004.02.09 03:24, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Willem Riede writes:
>  > Today, if you boot 2.6.x with hdd=ide-scsi, ide-scsi will attach to
>  > all your Atapi drives, not just hdd, unless you explicitely specified
>  > another driver for those.
>  > 
>  > Given that we don't want people to use ide-scsi for cdroms and cd-writers,
>  > that behavior is IMHO suboptimal.
>  > 
>  > The patch below makes ide-scsi attach ONLY to those drives that you tell
>  > it to. So if you want it to handle hdb and hdd, but not hdc, you boot
>  > with hdb=ide-scsi hdd=ide-scsi.
> 
> The patch I posted, which you apparently didn't like, doesn't
> require the use of boot-only options: it instead adds a module_param
> to ide-scsi which allows for greater flexibility.
> 
> Personally I never liked that butt-ugly hdX=ide-scsi hack.

I hear you. There are certainly advantages to use a module parameter rather
than a boot argument.

However, there should not be two mechanisms to achieve the same goal. For
better or for worse, the hdX=<driver> construction exists, and people are
using it. Its use is not limited to ide-scsi.

Since it can very easily be adjusted to achieve the desired selectivety,
I believe it is the mechanism of choice. 

Does anyone else have an opinion?

Thanks, Willem Riede.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-10  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-08 22:42 [PATCH] Selective attach for ide-scsi Willem Riede
2004-02-09  8:24 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-02-10  0:02   ` Willem Riede [this message]
2004-02-11 20:11     ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-02-14 22:06       ` Willem Riede
2004-02-14 22:54         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-02-14 23:03           ` Willem Riede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040210000205.GG28026@serve.riede.org \
    --to=wrlk@riede.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox