From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265913AbUBJTMK (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:12:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265975AbUBJTMJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:12:09 -0500 Received: from h24-82-88-106.vf.shawcable.net ([24.82.88.106]:1421 "HELO tinyvaio.nome.ca") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265913AbUBJTMH (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:12:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:12:34 -0800 From: Mike Bell To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs vs udev, thoughts from a devfs user Message-ID: <20040210191233.GA4814@tinyvaio.nome.ca> References: <20040210113417.GD4421@tinyvaio.nome.ca> <20040210170157.GA27421@kroah.com> <20040210175548.GN4421@tinyvaio.nome.ca> <20040210181932.GI28111@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040210181932.GI28111@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:19:32AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > ugh, and here I said I wouldn't respond. But to be fair, he wrote me > this before I said that... Also, since it's not intended to be a personal attack but rather an attempt to find the truth, whether you personally want to respond or not I'd still like to respond to the claims you made with why I think they're wrong.