From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: mporter@kernel.crashing.org, lists@mdiehl.de,
dsaxena@plexity.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] dma_sync_to_device
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:30:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040211113015.2b91bd89.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040211122319.B5618@home.com>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:23:19 -0700
Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:30:56AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > 1) pci_map_single(), device DMA's from the buffer.
> >
> > 2) pci_dma_sync_single(). Cpu writes some new command or
> > status flag into the buffer.
> >
> > 3) pci_dma_sync_to_device_single(), now device is asked to DMA from the buffer
> > again.
>
> Actually, not yet. Is it not possible for MIPS to determine the correct
> cache operation to use if step #3 used a pci_dma_sync_single() with a
> TO_DEVICE direction?
It should do a writeback of dirty data from the cpu cache, so that the device
may see it after pci_dma_sync_to_device_single() completes.
> I'm guessing that MIPS must have some kind of bridge cache in order to
> require the pci_dma_sync_to_device_single() if I'm starting to follow
> this.
Some platforms do, some don't. Sparc64 has PCI controller DMA caches but it's
cpu caches are fully coherent, for example. On such a platform this new interface
is going to be a NOP, but on things like MIPS it will not be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-11 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-10 17:31 [Patch] dma_sync_to_device Martin Diehl
2004-02-10 18:42 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-10 18:59 ` Martin Diehl
2004-02-11 6:17 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-11 6:51 ` Martin Diehl
2004-02-11 16:39 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-11 17:51 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-11 18:18 ` Matt Porter
2004-02-11 18:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-11 18:57 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-11 19:08 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-12 3:46 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-12 3:58 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-13 1:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-14 7:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-11 19:23 ` Matt Porter
2004-02-11 19:30 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-02-11 18:43 ` linux-2.6.2 Kernel Problem Elikster
2004-02-14 11:51 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-13 14:27 [Patch] dma_sync_to_device James Bottomley
2004-02-14 8:51 ` Martin Diehl
2004-02-14 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-14 23:18 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040211113015.2b91bd89.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@mdiehl.de \
--cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox