From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265976AbUBKSIl (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:08:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265954AbUBKSIl (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:08:41 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:23006 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266041AbUBKSCw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:02:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:02:33 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: Michael Hayes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Spelling in 2.6.2 Message-ID: <20040211180233.GC31676@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <200402102009.i1AK91T20554@aiinc.aiinc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402102009.i1AK91T20554@aiinc.aiinc.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Feb-10 2004, Tue, 12:09 -0800 Michael Hayes wrote: > I was curious how fast spelling errors flow into the kernel, so I > looked at the + lines in the 2.6.2 patch. A few of the errors > already existed, but most of them are new. It turns out that there > are around 200 new spelling errors in 2.6.2. Must be because today's keyboards are shite. ;) -TS