From: Jesse Allen <the3dfxdude@hotmail.com>
To: Derek Foreman <manmower@signalmarketing.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay.
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:44:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040212214407.GA865@tesore.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402121118490.515@gonopodium.signalmarketing.com>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:17:12PM -0600, Derek Foreman wrote:
> Some nforce2 systems work just fine. Is there a way to distinguish
> between systems that need it and those that don't?
>
Some nforce2 systems are fixed in certain bioses. The problem is we don't know where/what it is in the bios. C1 disconnect is a clue.
> (if anyone's running a betting pool, my money's on nforce2+cpu with half
> frequency multiplier ;)
I don't know what your talking about. My Shuttle AN35N nforce2 board can run vanilla kernels with the 12-5-2003 dated bios version and not lock up. The frequencies I run are all the default/standard ones.
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-12 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 15:22 [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay Ross Dickson
2004-02-12 18:17 ` Derek Foreman
2004-02-12 16:11 ` Daniel Drake
2004-02-12 19:30 ` [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaroundinstead " Carlos Silva
2004-02-12 19:54 ` [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead " Derek Foreman
2004-02-12 21:44 ` Jesse Allen [this message]
2004-02-12 21:52 ` Derek Foreman
2004-02-12 22:06 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-12 23:04 ` Jesse Allen
2004-02-12 23:15 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-12 23:37 ` Jesse Allen
2004-02-12 23:50 ` Craig Bradney
2004-02-12 23:20 ` Roberto Sanchez
2004-02-13 11:17 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-13 14:41 ` Ross Dickson
2004-02-13 15:55 ` Nforce2, APIC, CPU Disconnect and setup_boot_APIC_clock() cheuche+lkml
2004-02-14 1:24 ` [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay Ross Dickson
2004-02-14 4:46 ` GCC feature request: warn on "if (function_name)" Jamie Lokier
2004-02-14 4:51 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-02-14 11:16 ` [PATCH] 2.6, 2.4, Nforce2, Experimental idle halt workaround instead of apic ack delay Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-14 16:13 ` Ross Dickson
2004-02-14 21:46 ` Ian Kumlien
2004-02-23 1:33 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-23 19:50 ` Jesse Allen
2004-02-23 1:37 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-25 12:38 ` Ross Dickson
2004-02-25 19:49 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-02-25 21:44 ` Arjen Verweij
2004-02-26 0:13 ` Ross Dickson
2004-02-26 9:59 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-03-07 14:46 ` Craig Bradney
2004-03-08 22:42 ` Arjen Verweij
2004-03-08 22:59 ` Craig Bradney
2004-03-08 23:11 ` Arjen Verweij
2004-03-14 12:04 ` Arjen Verweij
2004-03-09 18:38 ` Josh McKinney
2004-03-24 15:59 ` Edd Dumbill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040212214407.GA865@tesore.local \
--to=the3dfxdude@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manmower@signalmarketing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox