From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266631AbUBLWDv (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:03:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266632AbUBLWDv (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:03:51 -0500 Received: from delerium.kernelslacker.org ([81.187.208.145]:59061 "EHLO delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266631AbUBLWDt (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:03:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:01:32 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: [PATCH] bogus __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ usage Message-ID: <20040212220132.GY12634@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, "Randy.Dunlap" References: <20040212162856.GU12634@redhat.com> <20040212134342.0874290a.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040212134342.0874290a.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 01:43:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I just did a mini-audit of users of __KERNEL_SYSCALLS and turned > > up a bunch of uglies. The patch below is the easy ones > > OK. But Randy is currently beavering away at the astonishing number of > open-coded sys_foo() declarations, and that work has a significant > intersection with yours. > > So can we please park this for now, pick it up again when Randy has > finished? Yeah, that's fine with me, as is Randy hoovering this up and rolling it in with his stuff if he wants.. Dave