From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267212AbUBMVV4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:21:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267225AbUBMVVz (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:21:55 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:32955 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267212AbUBMVVy (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:21:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:08:56 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Mike Bell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs vs udev, thoughts from a devfs user Message-ID: <20040213210856.GG14048@kroah.com> References: <20040210113417.GD4421@tinyvaio.nome.ca> <20040210170157.GA27421@kroah.com> <20040210175548.GN4421@tinyvaio.nome.ca> <20040210181932.GI28111@kroah.com> <20040210191233.GA4814@tinyvaio.nome.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040210191233.GA4814@tinyvaio.nome.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:12:34AM -0800, Mike Bell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:19:32AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > ugh, and here I said I wouldn't respond. But to be fair, he wrote me > > this before I said that... > > Also, since it's not intended to be a personal attack but rather an > attempt to find the truth, whether you personally want to respond or not > I'd still like to respond to the claims you made with why I think > they're wrong. Ok, will do.