* Re[2]: e1000 problems in 2.6.x
2004-02-15 3:22 ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2004-02-15 8:16 ` Elikster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elikster @ 2004-02-15 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello Bill,
You are not alone. It happened to all boxes with Intel E1000 network cards and integrated. It happened on 2.6.2 kernel version and I downgraded back to 2.4.24 version and it was running fine. The problems I experienced is network lag and lot of network disconnects and such. It is the kernel 2.6.2 that this problem showed up.
I haven't tried the latest versions yet that Linus just released to see if they fixed that issue yet.
Saturday, February 14, 2004, 8:22:43 PM, you wrote:
BD> Steve Simitzis wrote:
>> i should have mentioned in my email that i tried every combination of
>> settings: auto-neg on the box and forced on the switch, both forced
>> (to the same settings, of course), forced on the box with auto-neg on
>> the switch, and auto-neg on both sides. in all cases, the result was
>> the same: RX packet errors and the same watchdog messages. what i thought
>> was particularly strange was that the switch refused to auto-negotiate
>> full duplex.
--
Best regards,
Elikster mailto:elik@webspires.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re[2]: e1000 problems in 2.6.x
@ 2004-02-15 15:20 Klaus Dittrich
2004-02-16 1:14 ` Re[3]: " Elikster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Dittrich @ 2004-02-15 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux mailing-list
I have a Tyan-S2665 mobo which has an intergrated
e1000 and I never saw such errors with 2.6 kernels.
I use it with 100-MBit Full-Duplex in a switched
private network.
CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
CONFIG_E1000=y
CONFIG_E1000_NAPI=y
--
Klaus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re[3]: e1000 problems in 2.6.x
2004-02-15 15:20 Re[2]: e1000 problems in 2.6.x Klaus Dittrich
@ 2004-02-16 1:14 ` Elikster
2004-02-16 2:12 ` Steve Simitzis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elikster @ 2004-02-16 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux mailing-list
Hello Klaus,
Hmmm..that might explains it, since I don't use NAPI enabled on the E1000 and it works fine without in the 2.4.x series kernels, but under 2.6, it barfs half the time.
Sunday, February 15, 2004, 8:20:57 AM, you wrote:
KD> I have a Tyan-S2665 mobo which has an intergrated
KD> e1000 and I never saw such errors with 2.6 kernels.
KD> I use it with 100-MBit Full-Duplex in a switched
KD> private network.
KD> CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
KD> CONFIG_E1000=y
KD> CONFIG_E1000_NAPI=y
--
Best regards,
Elikster mailto:elik@webspires.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: e1000 problems in 2.6.x
2004-02-16 1:14 ` Re[3]: " Elikster
@ 2004-02-16 2:12 ` Steve Simitzis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Simitzis @ 2004-02-16 2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Elikster; +Cc: linux mailing-list
that doesn't explain it for me. i have NAPI enabled in the kernel, and
i still have problems in 2.6.x, and not in 2.4.22.
CONFIG_E1000=m
CONFIG_E1000_NAPI=y
:(
On 02/15/04, Elikster <elik@webspires.com> wrote:
> Hello Klaus,
>
> Hmmm..that might explains it, since I don't use NAPI enabled on the E1000 and it works fine without in the 2.4.x series kernels, but under 2.6, it barfs half the time.
>
> Sunday, February 15, 2004, 8:20:57 AM, you wrote:
>
> KD> I have a Tyan-S2665 mobo which has an intergrated
> KD> e1000 and I never saw such errors with 2.6 kernels.
>
> KD> I use it with 100-MBit Full-Duplex in a switched
> KD> private network.
>
> KD> CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
> KD> CONFIG_E1000=y
> KD> CONFIG_E1000_NAPI=y
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Elikster mailto:elik@webspires.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
steve simitzis : /sim' - i - jees/
pala : saturn5 productions
www.steve.org : 415.282.9979
hath the daemon spawn no fire?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-16 2:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-15 15:20 Re[2]: e1000 problems in 2.6.x Klaus Dittrich
2004-02-16 1:14 ` Re[3]: " Elikster
2004-02-16 2:12 ` Steve Simitzis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-15 0:26 Feldman, Scott
2004-02-15 2:32 ` Steve Simitzis
2004-02-15 3:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-15 8:16 ` Re[2]: " Elikster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox