From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
Cc: Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>,
Linux Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: dm core patches
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:35:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040216093504.GE21409@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040216081945.GF20998@marowsky-bree.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1069 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:19:45AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-02-13T17:08:59,
> Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> said:
>
> > one thing you can do is provide a way for drivers to wake the userspace
> > tester early. Say by default it polls every minute, but if the fiber
> > channel driver gets a LIP UP event it (via a central API) makes the
> > userspace daemon *now*.
>
> I may be missing something obvious, but a LIP UP should be accompanied
> with a round of 'device detections' on that link, which already should
> trigger a few hotplug events, no?
>
> So this seems pretty much solved.
not normaly; there are several reasons the loop can bounce briefly and right
now the fiber drivers don't notify linux of that every time. Maybe that's
for the better .... if it's a frequent thing that is short-timed then it
would be obscene to yank the disks from under the user (and force-umount his
fs) every few hours..
while in multipath you do want to at least stop using the current path if
there is another path that is not in negotiation...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-16 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-10 16:35 dm core patches Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 16:57 ` [Patch 1/10] dm: Export dm_vcalloc() Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 16:59 ` [Patch 2/10] dm: Lift to_bytes() and to_sectors() into dm.h Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 16:59 ` [Patch 3/10] dm: Get rid of struct dm_deferred_io in dm.c Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 17:33 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-10 17:00 ` [Patch 4/10] dm: Maintain ordering when deferring bios Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 17:00 ` [Patch 5/10] dm: Tidy up the error path for alloc_dev() Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 17:01 ` [Patch 6/10] dm: block size bug with 64 bit devs Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 17:01 ` [Patch 7/10] dm: Correct GFP flag in dm_table_create() Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 17:02 ` [Patch 8/10] dm: Zero size target sanity check Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 17:02 ` [Patch 9/10] dm: Remove redundant spin lock in dec_pending() Joe Thornber
2004-02-10 17:03 ` [Patch 10/10] dm: drop BIO_SEG_VALID bit Joe Thornber
2004-02-11 10:16 ` dm core patches Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-11 10:35 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-12 18:51 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-12 20:13 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-13 15:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-13 15:39 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-13 16:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-16 8:19 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-16 9:35 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2004-02-13 23:46 ` Mike Anderson
2004-02-16 12:17 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2004-02-13 16:03 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-13 16:44 James Bottomley
2004-02-16 8:22 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-16 16:57 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-16 17:04 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-19 0:26 ` Mike Christie
2004-02-19 3:40 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040216093504.GE21409@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=thornber@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox