From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>
Cc: coywolf@lovecn.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.2: "-" or "_", thats the question
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:41:32 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040217184132.541a5a76.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <402F42DE.5090308@t-online.de>
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:58:54 +0100
Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de> wrote:
> Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
> > Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What would be the correct way to get the filename of a
> >> loaded module? The basename would be sufficient.
> >>
> >>
> > The symbole names used in source code, like function names tend to use
> > "_", while the file names use "-" IMHO.
> >
>
> Naturally the symbols in the code use '_', cause for C '-'
> is not allowed within symbol names.
>
> I am interested in the module file names. 'cat /proc/modules'
> should return the correct module names, but for some modules
> (like uhci_hcd vs uhci-hcd.ko) '_' and '-' are messed up.
We canonicalize them at every point: you can use both.
Most users don't want to remember that it's ip_conntrack but uhci-hcd.
Hope that clarifies,
Rusty.
--
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-18 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 19:54 2.6.2: "-" or "_", thats the question Harald Dunkel
2004-02-15 2:38 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2004-02-15 9:58 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-17 7:41 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2004-02-18 1:28 ` Wakko Warner
2004-02-18 8:46 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-18 17:25 ` Wakko Warner
2004-02-19 1:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
[not found] <1o903-5d8-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pkw6-3BU-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1prnS-4x8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-15 15:02 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 7:21 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-16 8:48 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-16 11:11 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-16 14:13 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 14:22 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-16 19:01 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-18 21:58 ` Tony Breeds
[not found] <1pw4i-hM-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pw4i-hM-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pLmG-4E7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pRLz-21o-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pRVi-2am-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1pWi8-65a-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-16 23:28 ` Ryan Reich
2004-02-17 6:09 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-17 16:02 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-02-17 16:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-17 19:49 ` Harald Dunkel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040217184132.541a5a76.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=coywolf@lovecn.org \
--cc=harald.dunkel@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox