From: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KGDB bugreports <kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
Jim Houston <jim.houston@ccur.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][0/6] A different KGDB stub
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:16:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402191016.29107.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040218182100.GR16881@smtp.west.cox.net>
On Wednesday 18 Feb 2004 11:51 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:26:29AM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 Feb 2004 4:22 am, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > > The following is my next attempt at a different KGDB stub
> > > > > for your tree
> > > >
> > > > Is this the patch which everyone agrees on?
> > >
> > > It is based on Amit's version, so I think answer is "yes". I certainly
> > > like this one.
> >
> > I don't agree. I did a few more cleanups after Andi expressed concerns
> > over globals kgdb_memerr and debugger_memerr_expected.
> >
> > I liked Pavel's approach. Let's first get a minimal kgdb stub into
> > mainline kernel. Even this much is going to involve some effort. We can
> > merge other features later.
> >
> > Let's create a cvs tree at kgdb.sourceforge.net for kgdb components to be
> > pushed int mainline kernel. This split is to keep current kgdb
> > unaffected. People who are already using it won't be affected.
> >
> > May I suggest we breakup this task into following tasklets. I have
> > expanded item 1 because Pavel has something that's already close. The
> > rest of the items can be discussed in detail later. These need not be
> > done in this order except for first 2 whose sequence is fixed.
> >
> > 1. A minimal kgdb stub
> > core.patch:
> > kgdbstub.c full.
> > No changes to module.c
> > No changes for CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD
> > No changes to calling convention of do_IRQ (Needs to be done)
> > CONFIG_KGDB_CONSOLE removed
> > i386.patch
> > No changes for CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD
> > No manipulation of kernel stack before entry into do_IRQ
> > No non-source level CFI directives.
>
> My question is now, is there anything in CVS other than patches?
No.
The CVS tree contains patches only.
What I have described above are features of two patches: core.patch and
i386.patch.
> There's still a whole host of cleanups that need to be done to your
> version that I've got around here.
You are welcome to bring them into the cvs tree.
Thanks.
-Amit
>
> > 4. Patch to sync other architecture kgdbs with arch independent stub on
> > help from maintainers of those architectures.
> > 5. KGDB_CONSOLE patch
> > This is a must for embedded boards that have only one serial port
> > 6. gdb automatic module loading
> > 7. CONFIG_KGDB_THREAD patch
> > This may or may not be a separate config option. This patch will
> > include x86_64 support required to enable threads.
> > 8. i386 thread support
> > 9. Ethernet interface based on netconsole
> > 10. ... Any other features
>
> Personally, I'd swap 6 and 9.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-19 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-17 22:02 [PATCH][0/6] A different KGDB stub Tom Rini
2004-02-17 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-17 22:52 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-18 4:56 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-18 5:05 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 12:56 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-18 13:15 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-18 18:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-18 18:21 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-19 4:46 ` Amit S. Kale [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-12 0:02 Tom Rini
2004-02-12 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-12 16:52 ` Tom Rini
2004-02-13 18:58 ` Chris Wright
2004-02-13 19:04 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402191016.29107.amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--to=amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=jim.houston@ccur.com \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox