From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267314AbUBSVuI (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:50:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267342AbUBSVuI (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:50:08 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:5325 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267314AbUBSVuB (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:50:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:49:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_device_[un]register() are not syscalls Message-ID: <20040219214951.GA15338@kroah.com> References: <20040213080753.12af00bd.rddunlap@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040213080753.12af00bd.rddunlap@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:07:53AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > sys_xyz() names in Linux are all syscalls... except for > sys_device_register() and sys_device_unregister(). > > This patch renames them so that the sys_ namespace is once > again used only by syscalls. > > Comments? Looks good, I've applied this to my trees, and will send it to Linus. Thanks, greg k-h