Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!

David Woodhouse
2003-06-15T19:19:43Z

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 18:17, Russell King wrote:
> Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due
> to do another sync up, feel free to include that.

Well, given the 'NFTL aborts if add_mtd_blktrans functions exists,
rather calling it and aborting only it it returns non-zero' bug, I
suppose I am due such ;)

--
dwmw2