Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!

Russell King
2003-06-15T17:03:19Z

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote:
> > It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the
> > spin_unlocks. 8)
>
> I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful
> of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I
> assume that includes your afs partitioning fix?

Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due
to do another sync up, feel free to include that.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux