From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel/microcode.c error from new 64bit code
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:34:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040221173449.GA277@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402210914530.3301@ppc970.osdl.org>
Hi!
> > > + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
> > > + (unsigned long) uci->mc->bits,
> > > + (unsigned long) uci->mc->bits >> 16 >> 16);
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > I see what you are doing, but this is evil. At least comment /* ">> 32"
> > is undefined on i386 */ ?
>
> Sorry, but you're wrong.
>
> ">> 32" is underfined PERIOD! It has nothing to do with x86, it's a C
> standards issue. It's undefined on any 32-bit architecture. (shifting by
> the wordsize or bigger is simply not a defined C operation).
Yep, that is what I wanted to say. [This driver only has meaning for
i386 and ia32e => if we have 32-bit architecture, it must be i386.]
> The above is not evil. The above is the standard way of doing this in C if
> you know the word-size is 32-bits or bigger.
I'm just afraid that someone will mail you a patch replacing that with
>> 32 and you'll overlook it.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-21 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-18 22:52 kernel/microcode.c error from new 64bit code Stephen Hemminger
2004-02-18 23:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-18 23:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-21 14:16 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-21 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-21 17:34 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-02-21 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-21 18:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-02-21 18:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-21 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-21 19:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-02-22 20:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-22 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22 20:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-22 20:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-19 0:12 Nakajima, Jun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040221173449.GA277@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox