public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Large slab cache in 2.6.1
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:36:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040222023638.GA13840@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4037FCDA.4060501@matchmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> I have 1.5 GB of ram in this system that will be a Linux Terminal
> Server (but using Debian & VNC).  There's 600MB+ anonymous memory,
> 600MB+ slab cache, and 100MB page cache.  That's after turning off
> swap (it was 400MB into swap at the time).

I have a similar annoying problem...  I have a machine which is almost
always idle (single user work station type thing) with 1.5GB of RAM
and I end up with 850M in slab!

For me the main problem seems to be driven by dentry_cache itself
bloating up really big and those entries keep fs-specific memory
pinned.

Forcing paging will push this down to acceptable levels but it's a
really irritating solution --- I'm still trying to think of a better
way to stop the dentries from using such a disproportionate amount of
memory.

I'm played with -mm kernels and various patches out there...  nothing
seems to put enough pressure on the slab unless I force paging.

akpm, riel --- any (more) ideas here?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-22  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-22  0:50 Large slab cache in 2.6.1 Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  1:09 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  1:20   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:03     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  2:17       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:38         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:46           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:40         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  2:58           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:33       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:46         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:54           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:36 ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2004-02-22  3:03   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22  3:11     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  3:28       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22  3:29         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  3:31         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  4:01           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:10             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:30               ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:41                 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  5:37                   ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  5:44                     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  5:52                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  5:50                     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:01                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:17                         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22  6:35                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:57                             ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22  7:20                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  8:36                             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  9:13                               ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:16                                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  0:26                                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:34                                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  0:46                                       ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:54                                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  1:00                                           ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  1:06                                             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:45                         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:58                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  7:20                             ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:09                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 17:05                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-23  0:29                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:15         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 16:08           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-22 17:55             ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-23  3:45               ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22 21:13             ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-02-22 14:03         ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-02-23  2:28           ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-23  3:33             ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-02-22  3:21     ` Mike Fedyk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-22 11:00 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040222023638.GA13840@dingdong.cryptoapps.com \
    --to=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox