From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261659AbUBVD3P (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:29:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261662AbUBVD3P (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:29:15 -0500 Received: from uslink-66.173.43-133.uslink.net ([66.173.43.133]:53376 "EHLO dingdong.cryptoapps.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261659AbUBVD3O (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:29:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:29:13 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Fedyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Large slab cache in 2.6.1 Message-ID: <20040222032913.GA14149@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> References: <4037FCDA.4060501@matchmail.com> <20040222023638.GA13840@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> <20040222031113.GB13840@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 07:28:24PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > What happened to the experiment of having slab pages on the > (in)active lists and letting them be free'd that way? Didn't > somebody already do that? Ed Tomlinson and Craig Kulesa? Stupid question perhaps? But how would I implement this to test it out. It doesn't seem entirely trivial but I'm largely ignorant in these parts of the kernel.