From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com>,
Judith Lebzelter <judith@osdl.org>, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>,
cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>,
"Timothy D. Witham" <wookie@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel Cross Compiling [update]
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:07:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040222090711.A11210@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040222035350.GB31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at>; from herbert@13thfloor.at on Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> interesting is that some architectures (arm, chris, v850)
> do not even have an appropriate default config
For some (eg ARM) one single default config makes zero sense. I've
been debating about removing arch/arm/defconfig for this reason; we
have a whole host of machine default configurations in arch/arm/config
to serve this purpose.
> linux-2.4.25
> config dep kernel modules
>
> alpha/alpha: OK OK OK OK
> arm/arm: OK OK FAILED FAILED
ARM is not expected to build in 2.4 kernels, and probably never will.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-22 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-22 3:53 Kernel Cross Compiling [update] Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 6:02 ` Dan Kegel
2004-02-22 15:42 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-02-22 9:07 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-02-22 15:09 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 12:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2004-02-22 15:22 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 15:52 ` Paul Mundt
2004-02-22 17:07 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 17:23 ` Paul Mundt
2004-02-23 13:28 ` Richard Curnow
2004-02-23 14:41 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-26 13:02 ` Richard Curnow
2004-02-23 19:42 ` Jim Wilson
2004-02-23 20:32 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-24 1:49 ` Dan Kegel
2004-02-24 8:53 ` Herbert Poetzl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-22 16:36 Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040222090711.A11210@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=judith@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wilson@specifixinc.com \
--cc=wookie@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox