From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261204AbUBVJHR (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2004 04:07:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261205AbUBVJHR (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2004 04:07:17 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:47113 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261204AbUBVJHQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2004 04:07:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:07:11 +0000 From: Russell King To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Wilson , Judith Lebzelter , Dan Kegel , cliff white , "Timothy D. Witham" Subject: Re: Kernel Cross Compiling [update] Message-ID: <20040222090711.A11210@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Wilson , Judith Lebzelter , Dan Kegel , cliff white , "Timothy D. Witham" References: <20040222035350.GB31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040222035350.GB31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at>; from herbert@13thfloor.at on Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > interesting is that some architectures (arm, chris, v850) > do not even have an appropriate default config For some (eg ARM) one single default config makes zero sense. I've been debating about removing arch/arm/defconfig for this reason; we have a whole host of machine default configurations in arch/arm/config to serve this purpose. > linux-2.4.25 > config dep kernel modules > > alpha/alpha: OK OK OK OK > arm/arm: OK OK FAILED FAILED ARM is not expected to build in 2.4 kernels, and probably never will. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core