From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262220AbUBXKq6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:46:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262185AbUBXKq6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:46:58 -0500 Received: from [213.78.161.131] ([213.78.161.131]:28544 "HELO stockwith.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262220AbUBXKqM (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 05:46:12 -0500 From: Chris Lingard To: MALET JL Subject: Re: [linux 2.6.3] [gcc 3.3.3] compile errors. Now OT Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:46:07 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <403911B3.10601@laposte.net> <200402231658.53516.chris@ukpost.com> <403B0E92.60903@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <403B0E92.60903@laposte.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402241046.07323.chris@ukpost.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 February 2004 8:42 am, MALET JL wrote: > O_O! question what is the purpose of having two set of headers? do you > think this is good work to provide a unsable set of headers with a > software? why not include the RedHat's one then...... I think that this is off topic for this list; so I will email you direct, quite soon, with some reasons and links. Nothing wrong with using RedHat, nice distro; but your question was about building with 2.6.x headers. The functionality of 2.6.x is needed by glibc; but not in user space. How that is achieved is quite difficult. Chris