From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262280AbUBXPkH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:40:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262282AbUBXPkH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:40:07 -0500 Received: from host199.200-117-131.telecom.net.ar ([200.117.131.199]:37582 "EHLO smtp.bensa.ar") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262280AbUBXPkE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:40:04 -0500 From: Norberto Bensa To: Ian Soboroff Subject: Re: Why are 2.6 modules so huge? Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:40:54 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <9cfptc4lckg.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> In-Reply-To: <9cfptc4lckg.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402241240.54681.norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian Soboroff wrote: > Can anyone help me understand why 2.6-series kernel modules are so > huge? Debuging symbols? Regards, Norberto