From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
To: "'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Mukker, Atul" <Atulm@lsil.com>,
"'Arjan van de Ven'" <arjanv@redhat.com>,
"'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
"'Paul Wagland'" <paul@wagland.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SUBJECT CHANGE]: megaraid unified driver version 2.20.0.0-al pha1
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:38:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040225153821.C14838@lists.us.dell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040225204441.A9291@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:44:41PM +0000
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:44:41PM +0000, 'Christoph Hellwig' wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:38:48PM -0500, Mukker, Atul wrote:
> > > of their own, e.g. mptraid
> > Although, this simplifies the development and maintenance effort, having a
> > single driver to drive both controllers or two independent drivers is not
> > always our decision. Most often, it would be Dell's preference.
>
> Well, I think the people at Dell should get down from their fucking crackpipe
> then. (Matt, did you hear that? please stop this kind of marketing driven
> junk, thanks)
Yes, I'll try to figure out where this request came from, if from
anyone at Dell. My guess is it's related to other operating systems,
over which I have no control, but isn't relevant to Linux.
In general, I tend to fight exactly the opposite - people wanting
drivers split out for "new technology" - say, PCI Express, when the
driver<->firmware API hasn't changed, which is just wrong again.
If it's got a different driver<->firmware API, then it needs a new
driver. If it's the same API, then it should be the same driver.
FWIW, I'm out of the office for the next couple weeks with a new baby,
thus limited sleep and access to people, but I'll discover what I
can, and will take the heat internally for saying "split the driver"
if in fact you've got two different APIs, as I suspect you do.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Domsch
Sr. Software Engineer, Lead Engineer
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 20:38 [SUBJECT CHANGE]: megaraid unified driver version 2.20.0.0-al pha1 Mukker, Atul
2004-02-25 20:44 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2004-02-25 21:38 ` Matt Domsch [this message]
2004-02-26 2:27 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-25 20:41 Mukker, Atul
2004-02-25 23:05 Mukker, Atul
2004-02-26 2:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-26 2:44 ` Matt Domsch
2004-02-26 7:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-26 7:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-26 15:21 Mukker, Atul
2004-03-19 22:17 Mukker, Atul
2004-03-19 22:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040225153821.C14838@lists.us.dell.com \
--to=matt_domsch@dell.com \
--cc=Atulm@lsil.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@wagland.net \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox