public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@emsyssoft.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
	KGDB bugreports <kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: kgdb: rename i386-stub.c to kgdb.c
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:29:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402251629.42302.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040225103703.GB6206@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Wednesday 25 Feb 2004 4:07 pm, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > kgdb uses really confusing names for arch-dependend parts. This fixes
> > > it. Okay to commit?
> >
> > Why is arch/$x/kernel/$x-stub.c confusing? The name $x-stub.c is
> > indicative of architecture dependent code in it. Err, well so is the
> > path.
>
> Well, looking at i386-stub.c, how do you know it is kgdb-related?

hmm... I see what you meant by "confusing". The confusing part is file name 
not representing contents. Agreed.

> > PPC and sparc stubs in present vanilla kernel use this naming convention.
> > That's why I adopted it.
> >
> > I find kernel/kgdbstub.c, arch/$x/kernel/$x-stub.c more consistent
> > compared to kernel/kgdbstub.c, arch/$x/kernel/kgdb.c
>
> I actually made it kernel/kgdb.c and arch/*/kernel/kgdb.c. I believe

OOPS I didn't notice that.

> there's no point where one could be confused....

kernel/kgdb.c and arch/*kernel/kgdb.c have same file name appearing in two 
places :-( mainline kernel also does it (e.g. ptrace.c)

Let's  go with the convention followed in mainline kernel.
OK from me.

-Amit



  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-25 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-24 13:06 kgdb: rename i386-stub.c to kgdb.c Pavel Machek
2004-02-25  7:33 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-25 10:37   ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-25 10:59     ` Amit S. Kale [this message]
2004-02-25 11:10       ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-25 11:23         ` Amit S. Kale
2004-02-25 21:17     ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " George Anzinger
2004-02-25 21:25       ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-25 21:28       ` Tom Rini
2004-02-25 22:31         ` George Anzinger
2004-02-26  4:24           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-26 23:07             ` George Anzinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200402251629.42302.amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
    --to=amitkale@emsyssoft.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox