From: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
jlcooke@certainkey.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
adam@yggdrasil.com
Subject: Re: cryptoapi highmem bug
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:27:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040225212641.GA6587@leto.cs.pocnet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040225115027.580cc2ed.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:50:27AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Or maybe it's sufficient for crypt() to pass a simple boolean down to the
> prfn() callout which says "this is in-place encryption".
Yes, this works. As usual I was simply thinking too complicated. ;)
It looks like this now. It's on top of Jean-Luc's patch. Jean-Luc, can
update your patch and use this one instead? It's much simpler this way
and it keeps the whole voodoo in cipher.c.
diff -ur linux.orig/crypto/cipher.c linux/crypto/cipher.c
--- linux.orig/crypto/cipher.c 2004-02-25 17:26:06.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/crypto/cipher.c 2004-02-25 22:11:03.000000000 +0100
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
typedef void (cryptfn_t)(void *, u8 *, const u8 *);
typedef void (procfn_t)(struct crypto_tfm *, u8 *,
- u8*, cryptfn_t, int enc, void *);
+ u8*, cryptfn_t, int enc, void *, int);
static inline void xor_64(u8 *a, const u8 *b)
{
@@ -81,7 +81,9 @@
scatterwalk_copychunks(src_p, &walk_in, bsize, 0);
- prfn(tfm, dst_p, src_p, crfn, enc, info);
+ prfn(tfm, dst_p, src_p, crfn, enc, info,
+ scatterwalk_samebuf(&walk_in, &walk_out,
+ src_p, dst_p));
scatterwalk_done(&walk_in, 0, nbytes);
@@ -185,8 +187,8 @@
}
#endif /* CONFIG_CRYPTO_OMAC */
-static void cbc_process(struct crypto_tfm *tfm,
- u8 *dst, u8 *src, cryptfn_t fn, int enc, void *info)
+static void cbc_process(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, u8 *src,
+ cryptfn_t fn, int enc, void *info, int in_place)
{
u8 *iv = info;
@@ -202,9 +204,8 @@
fn(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), dst, iv);
memcpy(iv, dst, crypto_tfm_alg_blocksize(tfm));
} else {
- const int need_stack = (src == dst);
- u8 stack[need_stack ? crypto_tfm_alg_blocksize(tfm) : 0];
- u8 *buf = need_stack ? stack : dst;
+ u8 stack[in_place ? crypto_tfm_alg_blocksize(tfm) : 0];
+ u8 *buf = in_place ? stack : dst;
fn(crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm), buf, src);
tfm->crt_u.cipher.cit_xor_block(buf, iv);
@@ -214,13 +215,12 @@
}
}
-static void ctr_process(struct crypto_tfm *tfm,
- u8 *dst, u8 *src, cryptfn_t fn, int enc, void *info)
+static void ctr_process(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, u8 *src,
+ cryptfn_t fn, int enc, void *info, int in_place)
{
u8 *iv = info;
- const int need_stack = (src == dst);
- u8 stack[need_stack ? crypto_tfm_alg_blocksize(tfm) : 0];
- u8 *buf = need_stack ? stack : dst;
+ u8 stack[in_place ? crypto_tfm_alg_blocksize(tfm) : 0];
+ u8 *buf = in_place ? stack : dst;
int i;
/* Null encryption */
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
static void ecb_process(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, u8 *src,
- cryptfn_t fn, int enc, void *info)
+ cryptfn_t fn, int enc, void *info, int in_place)
{
/* we can use dst as scratch space since we overwrite it later */
omac_update(tfm, dst, src);
diff -ur linux.orig/crypto/scatterwalk.h linux/crypto/scatterwalk.h
--- linux.orig/crypto/scatterwalk.h 2004-02-25 17:26:06.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/crypto/scatterwalk.h 2004-02-25 22:10:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -38,6 +38,14 @@
return sg + 1;
}
+static inline int scatterwalk_samebuf(struct scatter_walk *walk_in,
+ struct scatter_walk *walk_out,
+ void *src_p, void *dst_p)
+{
+ return walk_in->page == walk_out->page &&
+ walk_in->data == src_p && walk_out->data == dst_p;
+}
+
void *scatterwalk_whichbuf(struct scatter_walk *walk, unsigned int nbytes, void *scratch);
void scatterwalk_start(struct scatter_walk *walk, struct scatterlist *sg);
int scatterwalk_copychunks(void *buf, struct scatter_walk *walk, size_t nbytes, int out);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-24 20:49 cryptoapi highmem bug Christophe Saout
2004-02-24 22:34 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-24 23:01 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 4:32 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 6:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 13:27 ` James Morris
2004-02-25 15:17 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 21:27 ` Christophe Saout [this message]
2004-02-25 21:41 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] move scatterwalk functions to own file Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] fix in-place de/encryption bug with highmem Christophe Saout
2004-02-26 4:13 ` James Morris
2004-02-26 11:03 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 15:31 ` cryptoapi highmem bug Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 15:51 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 15:44 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 16:13 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 16:09 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 18:11 ` cryptoapi OMAC (was: cryptoapi highmem bug) Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 20:59 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 21:44 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 18:15 ` cryptoapi highmem bug Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 20:12 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 20:39 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 20:46 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
2004-02-25 21:36 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-25 21:52 ` Jean-Luc Cooke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040225212641.GA6587@leto.cs.pocnet.net \
--to=christophe@saout.de \
--cc=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jlcooke@certainkey.com \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox