From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Grigor Gatchev <grigor@zadnik.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A Layered Kernel: Proposal
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:17:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040226121727.GI7580@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402261303490.21036-100000@lugburz.zadnik.org>
On Thu, Feb 26 2004, Grigor Gatchev wrote:
> I don't see the need for starting a project.
>
> First, if unsuccssful, no reason to start it. And if successful, it will
> fork the kernel development, with all negative implications following.
> I see no sense in doing what eventually will damage the kernel
> development, instead of improving it.
>
> Second, the development of the kernel is already going this way,
> regardless of our discussion. This is its logic. You can see no use of the
> discussion, but you cannot see no use in following the kernel development
> logic.
>
> What I offer is merely to see where the road that we tread now goes, and
> can't we avoid some of the sideswings and the muddy parts.
I love people saying 'we' even though they never contributed a single
line of code to the project! Thanks a lot for your offer, I think I'll
have to turn it down and get my insights elsewhere.
There are plenty other places to troll.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-24 20:05 A Layered Kernel: Proposal Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25 9:08 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 12:52 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-25 13:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 15:08 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 15:42 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-25 16:01 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-02-25 19:25 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-25 19:46 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 23:40 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26 0:55 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-26 15:43 ` Jesse Pollard
2004-02-26 17:12 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-27 9:45 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 11:03 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 5:59 ` jw schultz
2004-02-29 12:32 ` Christer Weinigel
2004-02-29 14:48 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-01 6:07 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-06 18:51 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08 3:11 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 12:23 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-08 17:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-03-08 20:41 ` viro
2004-03-09 19:12 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-03-09 21:03 ` Timothy Miller
2004-03-09 23:24 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 18:41 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-03-08 21:33 ` Paul Jackson
2004-02-25 14:44 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-24 22:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 10:03 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 19:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-25 21:59 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-25 22:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 11:46 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 12:17 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-02-26 16:37 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-26 18:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-26 19:23 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-27 11:18 ` Grigor Gatchev
2004-02-27 18:05 ` Tim Hockin
2004-02-27 18:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-27 18:27 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-28 0:26 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-24 20:28 Carlos Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040226121727.GI7580@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=grigor@zadnik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox